Skip to content
Narqix Academy

Support QA Scorecard

30 min

For every support specialist and QA Reviewer. After reading you will know exactly how email, chat and phone work is scored at Narqix, what full marks look like, which mistakes are auto-fails, and how to score yourself before QA does.

Track: Customer Support · Role: Support Agent, CSR, QA Reviewer · Time to complete: 30 min

How scoring works

Each sampled interaction is scored out of 100. Each criterion gets full marks, half marks or zero, as defined below. Auto-fails override everything: the score is 0.

ChannelPass markCoaching triggered below
Email and tickets88%88%
Chat85%85%
Phone85%85%
Complaints and escalations (any channel)90%90%

Two weeks below target leads to a written improvement plan with your lead. See the Quality Standard and QA Scoring in Narqix Standards.

Auto-fails (score 0)

These are serious because they can harm the customer, the client or the business. One auto-fail means the interaction scores zero, no matter how good the rest was.

Auto-failExample
Data to the wrong personOrder details sent to a different customer; customer data pasted into an unapproved tool or chat
Verification skippedEmail or address changed without the client's identity check
False or misleading informationSaying a refund was sent when it was not; inventing a delivery date
Rude, sarcastic or dismissive language"As I already told you twice…", mocking, arguing
Refund or credit above authority without approvalTier 1 refunding 300 USD with a 100 USD limit
A promise you knew would not be kept"You'll have it tomorrow" when tracking shows next week
Payment card data mishandledTyping, storing or repeating a full card number
Compliance step missedRecording disclosure not given where required; do-not-contact ignored

Email and ticket scorecard (pass 88%)

CriterionWeightFull marksHalf marksZero
1. Complete resolution25Every question answered; issue solved or a clearly owned next stepOne minor question missed, or next step vagueMain issue not addressed
2. Accuracy20Policy, prices, dates and order data all correct and checkedOne minor detail wrong with no customer impactWrong information that affects the customer
3. Empathy and personal touch15Personal first line proves the message was read; empathy sized to the problemGeneric but politeCold, robotic or bare macro
4. Clarity and structure10Answer first; short paragraphs; numbered stepsAnswer buried or long paragraphsHard to understand
5. Ownership of next steps10Who, what and when (with time zone) statedNext step without a timeNo next step when one is needed
6. Writing mechanics10No errors; name spelled right; no blank fields; correct regional spelling1 to 2 small errorsWrong name, blank field, or many errors
7. Process and documentation10Correct status, tags, priority and internal noteOne process item missingWrong status (for example Pending while we owe action) or no note on a handover

Chat scorecard (pass 85%)

CriterionWeightFull marks
1. Fast, specific greeting10Within 30 seconds, uses name and topic
2. Pace and silence handling15No gap longer than the time promised; holding messages used
3. Resolution25Solved, or an owned next step
4. Accuracy15All information correct
5. Short-form tone15Warm, clear, one idea per message
6. Macro tailoring10Saved replies adapted to the conversation
7. Close10Outcome summarized, next step stated, "anything else" offered

Phone scorecard (pass 85%)

CriterionWeightFull marks
1. Opening and compliance10Approved greeting; recording disclosure if required
2. Verification10Client's identity check completed before account details
3. Listening and tell-back15No interrupting; problem restated and confirmed
4. Resolution25Solved, or an owned next step
5. Accuracy15All information correct
6. Holds and transfers10Permission, reason, time, check-ins; warm transfer
7. Clarity and tone10Calm pace, clear numbers, read-backs
8. Close and log5Summary, next step, logged within 5 minutes

A scored example

See a scored email

Customer: "My order hasn't arrived and it's been 10 days. Also, can I change the color on my second order?"

Agent reply: "Hi (NAME), sorry for the delay. Your order is in transit and should arrive soon. Thanks!"

CriterionScoreEvidence
Complete resolution0 of 25Color change question not answered; "soon" is not a resolution
Accuracy10 of 20Tracking actually shows a delivery exception; "in transit" is incomplete
Empathy7.5 of 15Polite but generic
Clarity5 of 10Short, but no real answer
Next steps0 of 10No owner or time
Mechanics10 of 10No errors
Process5 of 10Tagged, but no note about the delivery exception
Total37.5Below pass. Coaching: read the full message; check tracking details; always state a next step.

Score yourself before sending

  • Did I check for any auto-fail risk (right customer, verification, card data, authority)?
  • Every question answered?
  • All facts checked in the system?
  • Personal first line?
  • Answer first?
  • Next step with owner and time?
  • Clean writing, right name, no blanks?
  • Right status, tags and note?

Coach's note: the two criteria with the most weight are Complete resolution and Accuracy, together 45 points. An agent who answers everything correctly, even with plain writing, will almost always pass. Beautiful writing with a wrong fact will not.

Never do this: never argue a QA score in front of other agents or ignore feedback. If you disagree, ask your QA Reviewer for a private review. Disputes can be taken to monthly calibration.

Check yourself

  1. What is the pass mark for email, and for complaints?
  2. List five auto-fails.
  3. Which two criteria carry the most weight on the email scorecard?
  4. A reply is perfect except it sets the ticket to Pending while the agent still owes a refund. Which criterion loses marks, and how many?

© Narqix Academy

Sign up or log in to track your progress.